The questions families ask shape who children become
The questions families ask each other shape who their children become
Prefer to read? Read the article this episode was made from, with every source linked.
This week's practice: Pick one shared moment from the day, ask one open question about it (what surprised you, what felt hard, what did you notice), and follow the answer with genuine curiosity. Repeat the same kinds of questions regularly until it becomes what your family does.
Full article: The questions families ask each other shape who their children become
Research: Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., and Reese, E. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. *Child Development*, 77(6), 1568-1588.
The research in this episode comes from a 2006 review in Child Development.
My kid got in the car after school yesterday and I asked how the day was, and I got: fine. That was it. Fine.
That single word is the whole episode. Because the question 'how was your day' is actually a pretty hard question to answer. It asks a child to summarize six hours in a second. And the research we are talking about today is really about what happens when we ask differently.
Okay. So what kind of question actually works?
The article this week draws on work by Robyn Fivush, Catherine Haden, and Elaine Reese. Their long-running research on what they call family reminiscing conversations was summarized in a 2006 review in Child Development. What they observed was this: children whose parents asked open, elaborative questions about shared experiences built richer, more coherent memories of their own lives, and a clearer sense of who they are.
Elaborative, meaning what exactly?
Meaning questions with real space inside them. What surprised you. What felt hard. What did you notice. Not questions with a yes or no sitting right there at the end. The researchers observed that when a child has to actually assemble an answer, something shifts. The assembling itself is the practice. Over time, that practice becomes how the child understands their own experience.
So it is not really about memory. It is about identity.
That is exactly the framing the article opens with. Erik Erikson described identity in 1968 as a story children assemble, with help, by being asked good questions and being listened to when they answer. The research from Fivush and her colleagues fills in what that looks like in an ordinary kitchen or a car.
What I like about that is it does not feel like a project. It feels like a conversation.
That is the point the article makes directly: you do not have to manufacture profound conversations. You have to ask the same kinds of questions, with patience, regularly enough that your child learns this is what your family does. A ritual beats a special occasion. Every time.
So what does the practice actually look like?
Pick one small shared experience from the day or the week. It does not have to be big. Dinner last night. The drive to the game. That moment at the store. And then ask one open question about it. What surprised you. What felt different from what you expected. What do you wish had gone another way.
And then I listen.
And then you listen, and you ask a follow-up. Not to correct or to redirect. To show you are genuinely curious about their answer. For children between five and nine, that follow-up does a lot of the work.
What does the first attempt look like, practically?
Start at a low-stakes moment. The ride home is good. Dinner is good. Bedtime, after the book, works for some families. The cue is a transition you already have. You are not adding a new block of time. You are adding a different question to a block of time that already exists.
Okay. What is the actual question I should try first?
The article points to three types. First: a what-surprised-you question. 'What was one thing today that was different from what you thought it would be?' That one works even with quiet kids because it is specific enough to grab onto.
My eight-year-old might actually answer that one.
Second type: a what-felt-hard question. Not 'did anything go wrong,' which invites a no, but 'what was the hardest part of today.' That question treats struggle as normal, which matters. And third: a what-did-you-notice question. 'What is something you saw or heard today that stuck with you.' That one surprises parents. Children notice things we miss entirely.
What if my kid gives me nothing? Shrugs, or says I don't know?
That is going to happen. The article is clear that the value is in the regularity, not in any single exchange. If a question lands flat, you can say 'I'll tell you mine.' Model the answer. Show them what it sounds like to notice your own day out loud. The conversation does not have to be long to count.
That actually takes the pressure off. For both of us.
It does. And here is one sign it is taking hold: watch for the moment your child asks you one back. 'What surprised you today, Dad.' That is the thing to notice. It means the habit has become mutual.
Is there something we keep from these conversations? Some way to hold onto them?
You could keep a very simple note. Not a journal with pressure attached. A phone note, or a sticky note on the fridge: one line about what your child said that week that you want to remember. Over months, that becomes something real. A small record of who they were noticing themselves to be.
I really like that. It is low enough that I might actually do it.
That is the whole idea. The article we are working from today is about the long game. Not one great dinner table conversation, but the pattern your family builds over years of asking. The full article, with every source linked, is at familygrowthproject dot com.
The research in this episode comes from a 2006 review in Child Development.
This episode was produced from our written article and performed with AI voices.
This episode was produced from our written article and performed with AI voices. Read how episodes are made.